Homeland Security - Response & Recovery Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Country Security - Response and Recovery - Essay Example a framework as in it comprise of various free components that must cooperate to accomplish regular yields â€, for example, quick lightening of enduring by the survivors of a cataclysmic event, mechanical mishap or psychological oppressor attack† (p.1). In this way, he referenced of three basic free components: to be specific the private divisions like Red Cross; state and neighborhood organizations; and government offices should arrange and team up with one another to accomplish the ideal outcome which is to have an increasingly productive and viable catastrophe reaction programs. There were situations before in United States of America in which the Federal government just guides nearby states in budgetary issues alone (p.2) and in which Miskel referenced that in a regular debacle, the administration assumes no operational job â€a meaning they simply bolster them as far as cash repayment (p3). Subsequently, the main thing that the essential components ought to do first is to organize with each other. The three significant components (private areas, state and nearby government, and government) must contribute and cooperate to accomplish a superior outcome and accomplish the objectives of fast lessening experiencing opportune and powerful coordination. The National reaction framework (NRS), under the Federal government, embraces this so-call Incident Command System (ICS) or Unified Command (UC) as a compelling device of dealing with all crisis reaction of occurrences for multi-jurisdictional circumstance. This unites neighborhood government, the government and the Responsible Party (RP) in coordination to counter in oil slicks and additionally other destructive compound substances that can jeopardize to the lives of its constituents. Beside this, they should execute programs that will help the residents in the midst of catastrophes or fiascos. The Community Emergency Response Team (CERT) Program, under the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is an apparatus in helping the individuals through its backing in giving workshops and training to set themselves up at whatever point surprising things occurred. â€Å"It teaches individuals about debacle readiness for dangers that may affect beneficiary territory and trains them in fundamental fiasco reaction aptitudes, for example, fire wellbeing, light pursuit and salvage, group association, and calamity clinical operations.† (CERT’s official site article). Along these lines, government ought to likewise look for individuals strengthening as one of the viable apparatus to make progress particularly in enormous, multi-organization and multi-jurisdictional society, subsequently, we should consistently place as a primary concern that we are not generally there when mishaps occur. Along these lines, it is likewise protected to guarantee that the individuals themselves could support themselves. Under our law, there two principle organizations that are responsible for the executives calamity control to be specific: the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) under the Executive bureau of Department of Homeland Security (DHS); and the Center for Excellence in Disaster Management and Humanitarian Assistance (COE) that was set up by the US Congress. In accordance with the DHS, the Citizens Corps (an intentional association) looks to relieve catastrophe and set up the populace for crisis reaction through state funded instruction, preparing, and exceed. What our state do is to give classes and genuine case demo to in any event cause our resident to get ready when a startling things happens. We focus on the youths in schools and train them what they would do in the midst of cataclysms. A model would be seismic tremor drills, first guides and the same. We target study halls and youngsters

Effect of Temperature on Enzyme Catalase Activity in a Potato

Impact of Temperature ( C ? ) on Enzyme Catalase Activity in potato Aim: To research the Effect of temperature (10, 37, 60) Celsius (C ? ) on chemical catalase movement in potato utilizing 2% of hydrogen peroxide (H202) as the substrate estimating the tallness (cm) of oxygen gas (bubbles) and ascertaining the volume of oxygen bubbles delivered (cm3) Introduction: Enzymes are organic impetuses that accelerate metabolic responses without being influenced. They bring down the initiation vitality expected to begin a response. Chemicals are influenced by a few elements including PH, Substrate focus; Temperature and other factors.Each catalyst has an ideal temperature at which its action is the most noteworthy, beneath this ideal temp, the active vitality of particles decline , in this manner the impacts between the dynamic site of the compound and substrate diminishes , accordingly the protein action will diminish , so diminishing the pace of the response If the temp. Surpasses the ideal temp. The dynamic vitality between particles increment thusly impacts increment prompting the adjustment in the tertiary structure of the protein and for this situation dynamic site is lost and the catalysts will be denatured so the response will back off &stops.Catalase is a chemical, discovered essentially in every living cell. It separates hydrogen peroxide (squander item) into water and oxygen. 2H? O? 2H2O+O2 As anticipated, the compound catalase action would be the most elevated at 37c ? (Ideal temp. )whenever expanded to 60c ? at that point the protein would be denatured and whenever diminished to 10c ? (extremely low temp. ) then the response would be moderate. Factors: Dependent: Height of oxygen bubbles (cm) utilizing a ruler. Free: Temperature (10c ? , 37c ? , 60c ? ) utilizing three diverse water showers each changed in accordance with a particular temp . Controlled: 1.Number of potato 3D shapes: 3 3D squares of potatoes were utilized in every preliminary at each extr aordinary temp. Whenever changed, regardless of whether decline or increment, at that point the quantity of proteins (dynamic site) accessible would change, thusly influencing the pace of the response. 2. Size of potato shapes with measurements 1cmx1cmx1. 5cm . This is constrained by cutting all potato 3D shapes with same measurements utilizing a ruler and a shaper. Whenever changed, at that point this would influence the pace of protein movement, consequently influencing the outcomes. 3. Volume of hydrogen peroxide: 15cm3 of hydrogen peroxide was estimated utilizing graduated chamber for every preliminary at various temp.If changed then the pace of catalyst movement would change, accordingly results won’t be precise. 4. Grouping of hydrogen peroxide: 2% of hydrogen peroxide was utilized through all preliminaries this is set up by adding 20cm3 of H2o2 to 1000cm3 of water. Whenever transformed it would influence the pace of compound action since substrate fixation is one of th e components that influence chemical action. 5. Volume of fluid cleanser: 2drops of fluid cleanser were added to each test tube all through the analysis. Whenever changed, at that point this will influence the tallness of oxygen bubbles estimated cm3 hence the outcomes won’t be exact. . Time: time was recorded for 2 minutes; whenever changed this will influence the outcomes. Materials: * 27 shapes of potato each with measurements 1cmx1cmx1. 5cm. * 15cm3 of 2% hydrogen peroxide for every preliminary. * 9 test tubes * Water acclimated to (60c ? ,37c ? &10c ? including ice) * 2drops of fluid cleanser in each test tube * Cutter * Ruler * 100cm3 graduated chamber * Stopwatch * 1000cm3 volumetric flagon * 50cm3 measuring glass Procedure: 1. Utilize the shaper, and ruler to cut 27 blocks of potato with measurements 1cmx1cmx1. 5cm 2. Modify the water shower temp one at 60c ? , the other one at 37c ? amp; last one at 10c ? including ice. 3. Spot 3 potato 3D shapes in every one of the three test tubes set at 10c ?. 4. Leave the test tubes at 10c ? for 10min. 5. Include 2 drops of cleanser for each test tube. 6. Measure 15cm3 of 2% hydrogen peroxide for each test tube utilizing graduated chamber. 7. Add 15cm3 of 2% H2o2 to each test tube, and promptly start the stop watch recording time for 2 min. 8. After 2 min precisely, utilize the ruler to quantify the stature of oxygen bubbles (cm). 9. Rehash stages 3 to 8 at an alternate temp (60c ? ,70c ? ). 10. Record all information in a sorted out table. Handling and Presenting Data: Table (1): Shows the tallness of oxygen bubbles delivered (cm) at various temp. (C ? ) TemperatureC ?  ± 0. 05| Height of oxygen bubbles created following 2 minutes (cm)| | Trial 1| Trial 2| Trial 3| 10. 00| 2. 00| 6. 00| 2. 00| 37. 00| 3. 00| 4. 50| 1. 50| 60. 00| 3. 00| 2. 00| 2. 00| Table (2): Shows mean stature in (cm) for oxygen bubbles  ± 0. 05 and volume of oxygen bubbles (cm3)â ±0. 05 at various temp (C ? ) Temperature C ? à ‚ ± 0. 05| Mean tallness (cm) for oxygen bubbles  ± 0. 05| Volume of mean tallness of oxygen bubbles cm3 0. 05| 10. 0| 3. 33| 16. 34| 37. 00| 4. 86| 23. 84| 60. 00| 2. 06| 10. 11| * Sample counts 10c ? 1. Mean stature of oxygen rises in cm. T1+T2+T33= 2+6+23= 3. 33cm 2. Volume of oxygen bubbles cm3 Volume of chamber: ? r2xh 3. 14x (1. 25)2ãâ€"3. 33=16. 34cm3 Discussion: As appeared in table (2) as temperature expanded from 10c ? to 37c ? , the mean stature in cm of oxygen bubbles expanded from 3. 33cm to 4. 86cm. Aa temperature increment from 37c ? to 60c ? the mean tallness cm of oxygen bubbles diminished from 4. 86cm to 2. 06cm. Reffering to the table (2) and diagram , as temp. ncreased from 10c ? to 37c ? the volume of oxygen bubbles (cm3) expanded from 16. 34cm3 to 23. 84cm3. As temp expanded from 37c ? to 60c ? the volume of oxygen bubbles delivered (cm3) diminished from 23. 84cm3 to 10. 11cm3. Every catalyst has an ideal temp. at which the pace of protein action is the most noteworthy. Over the ideal temp the dynamic vitality of particles increments accordingly the impacts between the dynamic site and the substrate increment and thus the compound would lose its 3D structure and dynamic site and the catalyst would be denatured.This is appeared in the diagram, as the volume of oxygen bubbles cm3 diminished from 23. 84cm3 to 10. 11cm3 at 60c ?. Beneath the ideal temp the active vitality of particles diminishes ,along these lines the crashes decline and the compound would back off and the pace of vitality diminishes as it’s appeared in table (2) the volume of oxygen bubble decline from 37c ? to 10c ?. As per our outcomes in table (2) and diagram, the ideal temp was 37c ? at which pace of chemical catalase movement was the most elevated as the most noteworthy volume of oxygen bubbles was delivered 23. 84cm3.The outcomes got coordinated the theory which expressed that 37c ? is the ideal temp for chemical catalase to break hydrogen peroxide which is a harmful item into water and oxygen. Assessment and Improvements: 1. Size of potato 3D shapes . Potato 3D shapes were cut into 3D squares of measurements 1cmx1cmx1. 5cm utilizing a ruler and a cutting edge which was a wellspring of mistake since all 3D shapes change marginally in size which implies the centralization of catalase chemical is extraordinary. A potato shaper that cut the potato into equivalent sizes . 2. Tallness of oxygen bubbles estimated by a ruler. This was wrong method.Volume could be estimated rather in stature utilizing gas Syringe which will give progressively precise outcomes 3. Volume of cleanser. 2 drops of cleanser were estimated utilizing a dropper. A pipette can be utilized which will give increasingly precise outcomes. Done BY: JIHAN AL-BUKHARI 9A â€â€â€â€â€â€â€â€â€â€â€â€â€â€â€ [ 1 ]. [ (Jones, 2009) ] [ 2 ]. â€Å"Introduction to Enzymes. †Ã‚ Factors Affecting Enzyme Activity (). N. p. , n. d. Web. 16 N ov. 2012. . [ 3 ]. â€Å"Effect of Temperature on Enzyme Activity. †Ã‚ Effect of Temperature on Enzyme Activity. N. p. , n. d. Web. 16 Nov. 2012. .

What do Alums do

What do Alums do *snively will be mad I beat him at posting this* *not anymore, curse you Stanford!!!!* So by now you might think you have a fair idea of what to expect when you get to MIT. Floatillas, Liquid Nitrogen, and peak internet use at 3a.m. every night. But what about after you graduate and Mattress Dominoes turn into Oh Noes!? Luckily the trend appears to be that MIT alumni are dedicated to having as much nerdy geeky fun as they did while they were in school, and so they tend to continue doing really cool things. I present to you as a case study the company LiveScribe. So this past weekend, Snively and I were invited to be a part of a start-up company called LiveScribe. They flew us into California for the weekend to attend training seminars and get some hands on time with their product. For those too lazy to google it, LiveScribe is a pen that does something that makes college students like myself (and you guys!) very happy. It records audio while you write notes. Its a simple thing, but thats the beauty of it. You take notes just like you do with a normal pen and paper and it records the audio from lectures. I personally detest note-taking because I tend to do one of two things. Either I obsessively write down everything a professor says, or I listen and understand while hes talking and thus leave my notes..lacking. With the LiveScribe pen you just tap record and it records audio while youre writing, which means you can slow down your professors who talk at .66667c, and condense an hours worth of lectures down to just an outline, leaving you with a really clean visual organization of the entire audios lecture. Snively wrote about it a while back, so you can check his blog out for some videos showing the pens usefulness in action. But whats REALLY cool about the company is that it was founded by a guy named Jim Margraff who is, you guessed it, an MIT alumnus. LiveScribe isnt the first time youve seen or heard of one of his products though. He also invented the technology for the Atlasphere (an interactive globe that may be a little before youre time.which makes me feel old), and much more recently the LeapFrog system that teaches little kids how to read. So have no fear kids, the fun never stops when youre an MIT student! How was the conference? It was AWESOME! Snively and I stuck out like.well like MIT students in a class full of sports management majors (and 16 other majors MIT doesnt have). But in a good way! Seriously, people thought we were (are you ready for this?): cool. Thats right, we were the MIT guys! People were interested in hearing about the crazy things we do at school and lots of the execs came and sat with us at meals to chat. The first night at dinner the Senior Science Advisor Andy Von Schaak came and sat down with me and we started about the little bit I can talk about my job at Los Alamos, which segued into what my plans and visions for the future are etc. Snively came and joined us and Andy gave us an interesting (but probably secret) problem to work out. It was a lot of fun! By the end of it, Andy and I exchanged deets (his word not mine) via Bump for the iPhone. (super cool app, we followed up with a discussion about how it probably works, but you should go check it out from th e app store if you have an iphone). Snively wrote a much better blog about the details of the experience, but theres one particularly illustrative event Id like to share with you. While we were at Berkley, one of the events we did involved people spinning a wheel with the opportunity to win a pen, with chances to win normal pens, or raffle tickets as well. What made it interesting were the two spin again spots. When we had gone back to the room we were talking about the inordinantly high number of pens we gave away, and that of course led to the odds. Tip #1, dont discuss odds with MIT kids. I estimated them to be about 1 in 10 and said so. Then an argument broke out about what effect the spin again spots had on the odds. But being the big nerd I am I knew that there was one way to solve this, and that was to solve this. I was able to get it into a series like this: The odds of winning immediately are 1 in 12. The odds of spinning again are 2 in 12, or 1 in 6. The odds of winning after getting a spin again therefore are 1/6(1/12), but theres also a chance youll spin again after spinning again, after which you could win or spin again, repeating the whole thing over and over again like episodes of Seinfeld after 1998. This led to the equation for odds being: 1/12+1/6(1/12+1/6(1/12+)) all the way to infinity. Hmm to infinity eh? that sounds like an infinite series to me! Sure enough if you distribute the 1/6 you get 1/12+1/12*6+1/12*6^2..1/12*6^n which means the odds are just: lim(k-inf) Sum(n,0,inf,1/12*6^n). The ridiculous math geniuses among you took a look at that and said yup one in ten, but since I couldnt remember all my convergence tests at the time, Snively and I were standing outside with a laptop running mathematica crunching numbers. Surprisingly enough, people asked what we were doing and were genuinely interested! I have a theory for why people think MIT kids are still kind of cool even though were used to being the nerds everywhere, but Snivelys wrote it up in his blog, so I wont bother repeating it. In short, being at MIT makes you legit, it means even though you do something nerdy, you do it at an impressive level, regardless of what it is. By the end of the night, we had people coming over to hang out in our room as we stumbled around YouTube and ran bash scripts in Terminal to replicate XKCD jokes. So there are a few lessons in there, one, dont argue about the odds. Two, MIT will open up a lot of cool opportunities for you to meet amazing people. Three, do what you love without caring what other people think of it, and you may be surprised to find that some people find your passion for it cool, even if they know nothing about the actual subject. Four, MIT alums are awesome.