The Forbidden Truth Regarding Cultural Identity Essay Topics Revealed by an Old Pro

The Forbidden Truth Regarding Cultural Identity Essay Topics Revealed by an Old Pro Rumors, Lies and Cultural Identity Essay Topics If you begin your culture identity essay without preparation, you might make plenty of mistakes. You might consider yourself as having several cultural identities simultaneously, so the most crucial issue is picking the one which resonates with you most. Everybody, sooner or later in their lives, suffers the exact same sense of inadequacies. The Puritan children on the opposite hand, had very little privacy and very little chance to do whatever may be deemed as corrupt throughout that time. The Battle Over Cultural Identity Essay Topics and How to Win It Second paragraph should concentrate on another one, etc. Thesis usually means an argumentative, powerful claim that must be proven. It is all dependent on the subject you decide on and the techniques you use in writing this type of academic paper. After reading, it is easy to write my paper and truly feel comfortable getting grades as large as you are able to imagine. Each paper has examples that are utilized to demonstrate the thesis statement. Don't forget that when you're writing your paper there aren't any incorrect answers. Since the start of the formation of the USA, race has been a big matter. Identity theft is getting a significant issue in last few decades. Students should begin by receiving their free yearly credit reports from a legitimate source. To begin with, pick the subject for investigation. Education is the fundamental need of human. Language is among the quickest and most efficient techniques to understand a community of people, while it's a little tribe or a complete nation. Teachers should operate to reinforce proper rebellion and minimize inappropriate rebellion. They need to re member that, in order to create a positive classroom environment, they must set the overall mood and tone for the classroom. A cultural identity essay is a form of creative or academic writing that expresses the sensation of belonging to a specific culture credited to the growing up and becoming a distinct person with its personality. Developing a notion of self or personal identity is a consequence of interaction with individuals who make up your culture. Generally, cultural identity is a set of cultural elements influencing the evolution of an individual's identity. At the current time, the essence of cultural identity is changing. With this much information on the topic of culture and various methods of life, it can be tough to choose what things to write about. My cultural identity is composed of lots of numerous aspects. There are a lot of helpful ways. Throughout history, relationships have developed and gone through dramatic changes dependent on the social norms at the moment. Co-culture greatly influences the ways whom I communicate with people outside my co-culture. By comparison, students ma act out in violent or self-destructive ways, and teachers want to be on the watch for such behavior so that they can help to stop it from continuing. Americans work very tough to attain their targets. Aside from shaping behaviors acceptable for women and men, behaviors between women and men also suffer cultural implications. Cultural Identity Essay Topics for Dummies Your background, religion, race or language won't be a factor to prepare your dream, but it turns into the benefit to satisfy your destiny. Macau is quite a special location in Asia because it's a blend of western and eastern culture. Needless to say, Arab identity is a great deal more complicated and cannot simply be defined by a mutual language. Noticeably accelerated the pace of social and cultural alterations, so the kinds of identification are getting more short-lived. Structure of cultu ral identity essay is going to be the very same in all instances, varying only with regard to size. In most cases, a topic involves a single sentence. The primary aim of the essay about cultural identity is to share a feeling of identification with the specific nation. Begin with the introduction revolving about your thesis and explain what you are going to be exploring in the essay. Choosing topics for essays takes a little time and energy. Extensive research isn't required. When you have selected the principal subject of your essay, it is the right time to invent an ideal topic. Once you get your topic, proceed to make an outline for your work to assist you work efficiently. The subject of assignment might appear narrow. Many times, the subject of this sort of essay appears too confined. Religion is really the most important in cultural society. If you don't understand how to do so, read the culture essay example. A culture is the sign of the nation and it's the soul of the people of what it is that they believe in. Also, it is pretty liberal about sexual identities too. Music is the ideal way to identify one with the specific culture. Language is the main cause of culture. It is one of the most important forms of material culture, without language there is no concept of culture. Bear in mind your essay may look nothing in this way. Life was pretty easy and uncomplicated for the youthful couple. Society today appears to operate in a completely different way. Cultural Identity Essay Topics Options Cultural identity is quite a complicated notion that includes multiple levels. Language can play a major part in cultural identity, particularly if you're bilingual. Family identity consists of the traits an individual has inherited together with the part in their family they've been born into. Cultural and ethnic identities, together with language, are among the most critical elements of human identity which should be observed, analysed and studied together.

Human Nature in Shakespears Plays - 2096 Words

Topic- in Shakespeare’s plays how is his unusual detailed knowledge of nature as well as of human beings shown? Shakespeare was a man who deeply loved nature and the beauty of it. He was not just an author who experienced and enjoyed nature but also as someone who studied, understood and knew nature intimately. In this essay there will be discussions about how Shakespeare would often use examples from nature to describe the nature of human beings in his plays and how did he show a deep understanding and knowledge of human nature which he would put that deep knowledge in his plays and poems. Shakespeare’s greatest influences were the works of other great writers as well as from variety of books, and plays which he used as subject†¦show more content†¦King Lear (1.1.169-173) In this speech Lear not only uses the power of the King which he no longer holds to banish Kent, but he also, unknown to himself, explains why he cannot or should not divide his kingdom, for it goes against both his ‘nature’ and his ‘place’ to divide his ‘power’ from his ‘sentence,’ which is exactly what he does, thereby attempting to deny his nature and position. Aside from the natural position of Kings the natural social order can also be seen in terms of power relations between characters: King over subjects, fathers over daughters, husbands over wives. This naturalization can be seen as being represented by the character of Lear. He possesses his daughters, because he controls over them, therefore it is only ‘natural’ that they should proclaim their love for him. Cordelia’s refuses this which is therefore shocking to Lear and he calls her ‘a wretch whom nature is ashamed’. (1.1.213-214) The animal imagery that is shown in King Lear indicates the unnaturalness of a character‘s behavior in comparison to how they should behave if they observed the natural social order. This contradiction again underlines the distinction between nature and the ‘natural social order’. Shakespeare was good in phycology and describing the human character. He did not state many new ideasShow MoreRelatedMariana by Alfred Lord Tennyson961 Words   |  4 PagesVictorian era, some of his most famous poems include Ulysses, In Memoriam or Lady of Shalott. This paper will focus on his poem published in 1830 entitled Mariana. Mariana is Tennysons well known poem, inspired by the charactre of the same name in shakespears play Measure for Measure. T.S Eliot heard in Mariana something new happening in English verse†, and critics such as Carol Christ or Dwight Culler have â€Å"commented preceptively on its use of atomistic detail to create a landscape of strangeness appropriateRead MoreWilliam Shakespeares Macbeth Essay examples1588 Words   |  7 Pagesmerely scratch the surface to discover that it is bursting with periodical references to political and social foundations of Shakespears and James I era. Shakespeares blend of the subliminal political and social references compliment other ever present themes also woven into the plot resulting in a rich tapestry of intrigue that elevates the play from being just a totally fictitious story but also a historical document that reflect the fears and beliefs of people of the

Why I Am Afraid Of Bees Essay Example For Students

Why I Am Afraid Of Bees Essay The story starts off with Gary Lutz sitting under his big oak tree in his backyard reading his comic books. Then Garys pain in the butt neighbor, Mr. Andretti, keeps scaring Gary by telling Gary that Mr. Andrettis beehive hasgone crazy. Gary falls for it every time because Gary is afraid of bees. Allday, Gary reads his comic books because he hates to do anything else. No onelikes Gary because they think hes a nerd, because he stinks at sports and looksweird. For instance, one time Gary was lined up to play baseball with the otherstudents and was last in line, and at the end of the game they lost because hestruck out. So, one of the big kids came up to him and punched him in the nose,so Gary ended up having to go home with a bloody nose. The next day Gary foundan ad while surfing on the web. It said in big bold letters, BodySwapping. Switch Bodies With Someone Else for One Whole Week. Gary likedthat idea because he needed a long vacation from himself. He decided that hewould go to the body-swapping place the next day since it was only few blocksaway. (What a coincidence) The next day Gary went to the company and asked if hecould sw itch bodies with someone else. The lady at the front desk, named Ms. Karmen, gave a picture to Gary and asked if he wanted to switch bodies with boyhis age named Barry. Gary said he would because this guy was really coollooking. Ms. Karmen said she would come to his house the next day. The next dayMs. Karmen showed up on time and set up the equipment. She started the machine. Then something went wrong. Gary turned into a bee! Ms. Karmen didnt know whathappened to Gary, so she took her equipment and left. Gary tried to get help,but he couldnt because he was just a bee. Gary found out that one of Mr. Andrettis bees got in the machine. Gary got used to how a bee flies, and thenhe went outside to get some pollen because he was hungry. After his meal, Garywent for a flight but got caught in a net! It was Mr. Andretti. He thought thatGary was one of the lost bees from his hive, and Mr. Andretti put Gary in thisbig dark beehive. Gary tried to get out but he couldnt. Then Gary rememberedsomething. Bees have to leave the hive to get pollen to make honey! There had tobe a way out! So Gary started looking. All these bees started chasing Gary, andGary didnt know why. All these bees surrounded Gary and aimed their stingers athim. He found out that they were moving Gary aside, because another bee wasdoing a dance. Gary remembered that when bees do a dance, it means theyregiving directions to other bees where good pollen is. Gary wandered around alittle bit. Gary thought that he was in a big scary maze. Then Gary found alittle hole. It was an exit! Gary hurried and got himself out of there. T helight was so bright Gary felt as if he were on the sun. The first thing thatpopped into Garys mind was going to Ms. Karmen, so Gary started flying to thecompany. When Gary got there the door wasnt open, so Gary slipped in the mailslot. Gary saw Ms. Karmen, but he realized that he couldnt get to her becausethere was a Plexiglas wall between her and Gary. Gary slipped under Ms. Karmensdesk. Gary remembered that he couldnt talk to anyone because he had such asmall voice. Then Gary remembered that Ms. Karmen had a microphone to speak tothe kids through the Plexiglas wall. Gary flew over to the microphone and spokethrough it to get Ms. Karmens attention. Once Ms. Karmen had realized whereGary was, she sadly said that Barry didnt want to give up being Gary becauseBarry was teaching everyone how to skateboard, and all the girls liked him. Garywas very upset, so he immediately flew to his house, where Barry was. When Garygot there, he knew that he would die if he stung Barry, but because he was soupset and not thinking clearly Gary stung Barry anyway. Suddenly everythingstarted to fade, and Gary realized that he was dying. Then Gary woke up. He wasback to his regular life. Gary was confused, so he just thought that it was adream. Gary needed some air so he went outside and all the girls were on Garysdriveway ready for their skateboard lessons. Gary found out that he was reallygood at skateboarding. The main character in this book is Gary Lutz. Gary Lutzis afraid easily and very observant. Gary is a scared boy because he is scaredof about everything, like when a bee was by him and he ran away. He is observantbecause when he was in the hive he kept watching the bees closely to see whatthey were doing, like when the bees were doing a dance, and he realized that thebees were giving directions. I think that the theme of the book is, life is goodso dont make any changes, because Gary wanted to change his life by switchingbodies with someone else but it turned into a disas ter. Thats why you shouldappreciate who you are and not compare others with you. I think the author wrotethe book to entertain because I know that R. L. Stine likes to entertain peoplewith horror stories. I didnt like this book very much because it was very fakesounding. .u8f03e483c9c09356b855f83b86ac5ab5 , .u8f03e483c9c09356b855f83b86ac5ab5 .postImageUrl , .u8f03e483c9c09356b855f83b86ac5ab5 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u8f03e483c9c09356b855f83b86ac5ab5 , .u8f03e483c9c09356b855f83b86ac5ab5:hover , .u8f03e483c9c09356b855f83b86ac5ab5:visited , .u8f03e483c9c09356b855f83b86ac5ab5:active { border:0!important; } .u8f03e483c9c09356b855f83b86ac5ab5 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u8f03e483c9c09356b855f83b86ac5ab5 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u8f03e483c9c09356b855f83b86ac5ab5:active , .u8f03e483c9c09356b855f83b86ac5ab5:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u8f03e483c9c09356b855f83b86ac5ab5 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u8f03e483c9c09356b855f83b86ac5ab5 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u8f03e483c9c09356b855f83b86ac5ab5 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u8f03e483c9c09356b855f83b86ac5ab5 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u8f03e483c9c09356b855f83b86ac5ab5:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u8f03e483c9c09356b855f83b86ac5ab5 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u8f03e483c9c09356b855f83b86ac5ab5 .u8f03e483c9c09356b855f83b86ac5ab5-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u8f03e483c9c09356b855f83b86ac5ab5:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Seeing futher through tears th EssayBook Reports

The death penalty can it ever be justified

The controversy, surrounding the practice of sentencing criminals to the death penalty, continues to remain an important part of public discourses in Western countries. Partially, this explains why, as of today, this practice is being commonly regarded inappropriate by those politicians/public figures, who strive to gain the reputation of being particularly progressive individuals.Advertising We will write a custom research paper sample on The death penalty: can it ever be justified? specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Nevertheless, the majority of those who argue in favor of banning the death penalty, while referring to this type of a criminal punishment as being utterly inhumane, do not seem to realize the sheer wrongness of their stance on the subject matter. In this paper, I will aim to explore the validity of this statement at length, while promoting the idea that the practice of sentencing socially dangerous criminals to death simply cannot be disposed of, because it serves the function of maintaining the society’s innate integrity. The most common misconception of the death penalty is that it is being applied for essentially retributive purposes. That is, many people continue to believe that this form of a criminal punishment should be discussed in terms of an ‘ultimate revenge’, carried out by the state. Such point of view, however, does not appear thoroughly justified. The validity of this suggestion can be well explored in regards to the statistical data, concerned with the instances of the death penalty being carried out in the US for the duration of fifty years. According to this data, 95% of the executed criminals consisted of those who committed particularly gruesome crimes, such as premeditated homicides and gang-rapes/child-molestations, which resulted in the victims’ deaths (Jiang, Lambert, Wang, Saito and Pilot 2010). In its turn, this implies that there was in fact very little humanness in these criminals, as the sheer horrendousness of their crimes suggest the concerned individuals’ savagery. In other words, the specifics of these people’s upbringing had very little to do with their decision to commit the earlier mentioned crimes, but rather the specifics of their genetically predetermined ‘brain wiring’. Apparently, the majority of executed individuals in the US appears to have consisted of the so-called ‘born criminals’, incapable of feeling even a slightest remorse for what they have done. This simply could not be otherwise, because the very physical appearance of the overwhelming majority of ‘born criminals’ suggests that their affiliation with humanity is being purely formal.Advertising Looking for research paper on political sciences? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More As the founding father of the Positive Criminology Lombroso not ed, â€Å"Many of the characteristics of primitive man (savage) are also commonly found in the born criminal, including low, sloping foreheads, overdeveloped sinuses, overdevelopment of jaws and cheekbones, prognathism, oblique and large eye sockets† (22). What it means is that, contrary to the assumption that by executing this kind of criminals, the state simply strives to appease the victims’ relatives, the actual aim of the application of the death penalty, in this respect, is different. Apparently, the capital criminal punishment serves the purpose of defending the society against individuals that are being ‘programmed’ to defy the very principles of the society’s normal functioning. This is exactly the reason why in the former Soviet Union, the death penalty used to be defined as the ‘ultimate instrument of the society’s defense against criminals’. Thus, it will not be much of an exaggeration to say that the very theoretical premises, upon which the opponents of the death penalty base their line of argumentation, appear fallacious. For example, these opponents (abolitionists) suggest that the continuous socio-economic progress in Western countries implies the sheer outdatedness of the practice of sentencing convicted criminals to death, as such that is being inconsistent with the process of more and more people growing increasingly tolerant (Bedau 2002). Nevertheless, those who come up with such a claim do not realize the simple fact that the people’s tendency to choose in favor of a tolerant mode of living does not come out of nowhere – it simply reflects the process of their living-standards becoming continually improved. Yet, it is only in the society where the majority of its members consist of psychologically adequate individuals, where the continuation of the earlier mentioned economic progress is possible, in the first place. Unfortunately, currently deployed domestic policies in W estern countries, which rest upon the assumption that people’s behavior cannot be discussed outside of what accounted for the particulars of their upbringing, make it increasingly harder to maintain such a situation. This is because they deny the very possibility for people’s act to be reflective of their biological constitution. In its turn, this delegitimizes the suggestion that it is indeed fully appropriate to strive to improve people biologically, by the mean exercising a control over their baby-making activities. As a result, the number of mentally inadequate ‘born criminals’, potentially capable of perpetrating the earlier mentioned horrendous crimes, continues to increase rather rapidly. The validity of this statement can be well illustrated in regards to the characteristics of crime-rates in today’s Western countries.Advertising We will write a custom research paper sample on The death penalty: can it ever be justified? specifically fo r you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More However, it is not only that the society, in which ‘born criminals’ appear to account for the population’s growing segment, is being less capable of advancing economically, due to the continually reduced number of socially-productive citizens. Apparently, the functional effectiveness of such a society also suffers from the fact that it needs to sustain the pointless existence of ‘born criminals’, incarcerated for life. Thus, the very assumption that in civilized societies hardened criminals should not be put to death, promoted by ‘progressive’ citizens, is being potentially capable of setting Western societies on the path of becoming less civilized – pure and simple. Therefore, it makes so much more sense executing the most dangerous criminals then allowing their critical mass to grow to the point when the state-officials would realize themselves quite helpless, wh ile trying to improve the criminological situation within the society. Another commonly used argument against the death penalty is based upon people’s idealistic belief in the ‘sanctity’ of one’s life. The origins of this belief can be traced back to the Christian cultural legacy, concerned with the assumption that every individual is being endowed with the unique ‘soul’ of its own. Nevertheless, the revolutionary breakthroughs in the fields of biology, psychology and physics, which had taken place during the course of recent decades, effectively expose the sheer fallaciousness of this assumption. Apparently, the value of every individual’s life can no longer be discussed in terms of an independent but rather dependent variable. In plain words – the more a particular person is being capable of contributing to the society’s well-being, the higher is his or her objective worth. Given the fact that viciously-minded ‘bor n criminals’, who account for the majority of executed evildoers, did not only benefit the society, but tried to cause as much damage to their co-citizens, as possible, suggesting that their lives may have represented a certain ‘value’ is nothing but yet another moralistic illusion. We need to understand that it is only natural resources, which may represent a universally recognized value, simply because the amount of these resources is limited. ‘Human resources’, on the other hand, are fully self-renewable. Moreover, as the realities of today’s living indicate, it is because many citizens in the ‘developing’ countries appear fully preoccupied with baby-making, while being encouraged to do so by Catholic priests (who deny contraceptives, as such that are being inconsistent with the concept of the human life’s ‘sanctity’), which prevents these countries from being able to get out of poverty.Advertising Looking for research paper on political sciences? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Therefore, it indeed makes very little sense justifying the abolishment of the death penalty on the ground that the lives of those who commit most despicable crimes should be considered ‘untouchable’. The only reasonable argument, to which the proponents of the death penalty’s banning refer to, while trying to substantiate the validity of their stance on the issue, is the fact that there have been a number of cases of wrongly convicted people sentenced to death, especially in countries known for rather ineffective functioning of their justice-systems. For example, it is now believed that at least one individual has been wrongly executed in Russia, due to his ‘confession’ (extracted under torture) of being the famous ‘Chicatilo’ serial-killer, who murdered and cannibalized fifty-three innocent children (Evans 2001). To this, we can put forward two counterarguments. First, the error-margin in judicial decisions in Western countries can be best defined as being rather negligible. For example, in the U.S. the annual average rate of wrongfully passed criminal sentences (in all felony cases) accounts for only 0.5% (Huff 2004). The rate of wrongful convictions that resulted in the passing of death sentences in America cannot even be calculated, as there have been only a few mistakenly convicted and consequently executed ‘criminals’, throughout the history of American jurisprudence. Second, the fact that the enactment of the death penalty is potentially capable of resulting in wrongfully convicted citizens being executed does not outweigh the capital punishment’s benefits to the society’s overall well-being. The validity of this suggestion can be illustrated in regards to a number of famous legal cases, concerned with one’s private interests vs. the society’s interests, which have been arbitrated in favor of the latter. The proponents of the death penalty’s banning may sugges t that, even though it is specifically ‘born criminals’ who are being usually sentenced to death, there are also many instances of the death sentence having been passed to thoroughly adequate individuals. For example, in today’s China, it represents a commonplace practice to execute high-ranking governmental officials, convicted of bribery. In fact, Western civil rights activists never cease whining about this practice, as such that in their view is being inconsistent with the principles of a civilized living (Kielsgard 2011). What they fail to understand, however, is that it is specifically the proper functioning of the economy, which allows people to be able to enjoy a civilized living, in the first place. Given the fact that this country’s economic development continues to be observant of essentially socialist principles; it naturally causes the Chinese economy to be particularly prone to corruption. And, as the Chinese experience indicates, nothing can be more effective, as the mean of prompting governmental officials to think twice, before they decide to accept bribes, then exposing them to the sight of other corrupted officials being executed by a firing squad in public. This once again points out to the sheer erroneousness of suggestions that the death penalty is being morally inappropriate. Whatever ironic it may sound – just as the possession of nuclear weapons by the US and the USSR prevented these countries from declaring war on each other, the immoral practice of having the death penalty legally enacted, strengthened the extent of the affected societies’ association with the very notion of morality. As it was shown earlier, even though there are a number of seemingly reasonable objections to the death penalty, the closer analysis of the issue in question reveals the fact that many publicly prominent individuals, known for their stance against the continuous enactment of the capital punishment, do not think o f the subject matter logically but rather emotionally. As a result, their line of an abolitionist reasoning suffers a great deal of damage. Yet, once we adopt a thoroughly logical approach towards evaluating the appropriateness of the death penalty’s legal status, it will appear that there is indeed only a very few sound argument against this ultimate form of a criminal punishment. What it means is that, contrary to what civil rights activists want us to believe; the continuous legal enactment of the death penalty in such countries as China and the US is being fully justified. This is because it helps these countries to maintain their societal integrity. I believe that the earlier provided line of argumentation, in defense of the death penalty, is fully consistent with the paper’s initial thesis. Works Cited Bedau, Hugo. â€Å"The Minimal Invasion Argument Against the Death Penalty.†Ã‚  Criminal Justice Ethics 21.2 (2002): 3-8. Print. Evans, Julian. â€Å"Itâ⠂¬â„¢s All Just Meat.† New Statesman 14.650 (2001): 52-54. Print. Huff, Ronald. â€Å"Wrongful Convictions: The American Experience.† Canadian  Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice 46. 2 (2004): 107-120. Print. Jiang, Shanhe, Eric Lambert, Jin Wang, Toyoji Saito and Rebecca Pilot. â€Å"Death Penalty Views in China, Japan and the U.S.: An Empirical Comparison.† Journal of Criminal Justice 38.5 (2010): 862-869. Print. Kielsgard, Mark. â€Å"Universalism and Human Rights in the 21st Century.† Asia  Pacific Law Review 19.2 (2011): 155-176.Print. Lombroso, Cesare. Criminal Man, Durham: Duke University Press, 2006. Print. This research paper on The death penalty: can it ever be justified? was written and submitted by user Angela W. to help you with your own studies. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly. You can donate your paper here.